International law increasingly optional for powerful states, eroding global peace and stability
The article argues that public international law is increasingly seen as "optional" by powerful states, leading to a fraying of the rules-based order. It highlights numerous violations of foundational principles, including the UN Charter's prohibition on the use of force, sovereignty, and territorial integrity, citing Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran. Violations of UNCLOS, international humanitarian law, human rights treaties, and arms-control regimes are also discussed. The author contends that the impunity with which powerful states act signals that "might is right," leading to a vacuum where power determines legality and threatening global peace and stability.
Key Points
- International law is increasingly disregarded by powerful states, undermining the rules-based global order.
- Violations of the UN Charter's prohibition on the use of force and principles of sovereignty are becoming common.
- Examples include Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran, and China's actions in the South China Sea.
- International humanitarian law, human rights treaties, and arms-control regimes have also suffered grievous violations globally.
- The impunity of powerful states in violating international law creates a vacuum where power, not principle, dictates outcomes, leading to global instability.
Exam Facts
- The UN Charter prohibits the use of force and guarantees sovereignty and territorial integrity.
- The 2003 Iraq invasion and Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine are cited as breaches.
- UNCLOS (UN Convention on the Law of the Sea) is one of the most widely ratified treaties.
- The collapse of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty is mentioned.
Read it. Retain it. Recall it.
Get spaced-repetition flashcards, daily quizzes and offline access — free on Android.