Calcutta HC rejects govt. objections to Nicobar plea for ₹92,000-crore Great Nicobar Island project
The Calcutta High Court has overruled the Union government's preliminary objections to petitions challenging the ₹92,000-crore Great Nicobar Island project. The petitions allege violations of the Forest Rights Act (FRA) in obtaining consent for the project. The court dismissed the Centre's argument that petitioner Meena Gupta lacked locus standi, affirming her sufficient interest in espousing the cause of the vulnerable tribal community. Issues raised include the validity of Gram Sabha resolutions, the constitution of a sub-divisional committee, and notifications reducing buffer zones for Campbell Bay and Galathea Bay National Parks. The Centre had argued the project's national importance should shield it from Public Interest Litigations.
Key Points
- The Calcutta High Court dismissed the Union government's objections to petitions challenging the Great Nicobar Island project.
- The petitions allege violations of the Forest Rights Act (FRA) in the process of obtaining consent for the mega-infrastructure project.
- The court affirmed the petitioner's locus standi, recognizing her interest in advocating for the vulnerable tribal community.
- Key issues include the validity of Gram Sabha resolutions and the reduction of buffer zones for national parks.
Exam Facts
- The project in question is the ₹92,000-crore Great Nicobar Island project.
- The petitioner is Meena Gupta, a retired IAS officer.
- The legal challenge is based on alleged violations of the Forest Rights Act (FRA) of 2006.
- The petitions specifically mention Campbell Bay and Galathea Bay National Parks.
Read it. Retain it. Recall it.
Get spaced-repetition flashcards, daily quizzes and offline access — free on Android.