The Artemis II lunar flyby mission, carrying four astronauts, recently achieved a significant milestone by taking humans the furthest they have ever been from Earth. An image captured from the Orion spacecraft depicted an 'earthset,' where Earth appears to dip beyond the lunar horizon, marking a unique perspective from the lunar horizon. This mission, which occurred on Monday, highlights NASA's ongoing advancements in space exploration and sets the stage for future lunar endeavors, pushing the boundaries of human presence in space and gathering crucial data for upcoming deep-space missions.
The Artemis II mission involved a lunar flyby with four astronauts.
The mission set a new record for the furthest distance humans have traveled from Earth.
An 'earthset' was observed and photographed from the Orion spacecraft.
Exam Points
Mission: Artemis II lunar flyby mission.
Spacecraft: Orion.
Observation: 'Earthset' (Earth dipping beyond the lunar horizon).
The Supreme Court's nine-judge Constitution Bench has begun reviewing its 2018 judgment that upheld the right of women of menstruating age to enter the Sabarimala shrine. Justice B.V. Nagarathna stated that courts can intervene if social evils are given a religious color. Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta argued against judicial overreach into religious practices, questioning courts' expertise in determining "essential religious practices" and interpreting religious texts. The review aims to establish a 'judicial policy' for constitutional courts regarding religious freedom under Articles 25 and 26.
The Supreme Court is reviewing its 2018 judgment on women's entry to the Sabarimala temple.
Justice B.V. Nagarathna highlighted the judiciary's role in distinguishing social evils from religious practices.
Arguments focused on the extent of judicial review over "essential religious practices" and the interpretation of religious texts.
Exam Points
Case: Review of 2018 Sabarimala judgment.
Bench: Nine-judge Constitution Bench.
Key Judges: Justice B.V. Nagarathna, Chief Justice of India Surya Kant.
Parliament passed the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023, reserving one-third of seats for women in Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabhas, but its implementation is deferred until after the next Census and delimitation. The government now plans to amend the Act, basing delimitation on the 2011 Census and potentially expanding Lok Sabha seats by 50% (from 543 to 816). This approach, while framed as expediting implementation, raises concerns about representational balance due to demographic shifts, potential north-south divide, and the use of outdated 2011 Census data, impacting fairness and political dynamics.
The Women's Reservation Act (Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam) defers implementation until post-Census and delimitation.
The government proposes to use the 2011 Census for delimitation and expand Lok Sabha seats by 50%.
Concerns exist regarding the impact of outdated data and seat expansion on north-south representational balance.
The conviction of nine policemen in the Sattankulam custodial death case, involving trader Jayaraj and his son Benicks, highlights the critical role of an engaged judiciary, courageous witnesses, and determined investigation in delivering justice. The trial court's reliance on CBI scientific evidence, despite attempts to destroy it, led to the convictions. This verdict sends a strong message against the misuse of force by law enforcement, emphasizing that custodial deaths will not go unpunished and underscoring the need for systemic reckoning to sensitize the police force against excessive force.
Nine policemen were convicted in the Sattankulam custodial death case of Jayaraj and Benicks.
The verdict underscores the importance of judicial activism, witness courage, and scientific investigation.
The case involved torture and trumped-up charges, leading to the deaths of the victims in judicial custody.
Exam Points
Case: Sattankulam custodial deaths case.
Victims: Jayaraj and his son Benicks.
Location: Sattankulam police station, Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu.
The interim stay on the UGC Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions Regulation, 2026, highlights the debate on caste-based discrimination. The regulation defines "caste-based discrimination" specifically for SC, ST, and OBCs, which is criticized for not being 'caste-neutral'. The article argues that formal neutrality misunderstands caste as a structural hierarchy, not isolated incidents. Constitutional Articles 14 and 15 support differential treatment for substantive equality, not abstract sameness. Effective enforcement mechanisms, independent complaint systems, and accountability are crucial for the UGC framework to fulfill its constitutional promise of equality.
The UGC regulations define caste-based discrimination specifically for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Other Backward Classes.
A 'caste-neutral' definition risks collapsing structural inequality into a universal grievance framework, diluting the law's effectiveness.
Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution mandate substantive equality, allowing for differential treatment to remedy historical disadvantage.
Exam Points
Regulation: UGC Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions Regulation, 2026.
Case: Abeda Salim Tadvi v Union of India.
Constitutional Articles: Article 14 and Article 15.
Kerala consistently ranks high across various human development, health, education, and economic indicators, outperforming most other Indian states. Data from NFHS 2021-22 and NITI Aayog SDG India Index shows Kerala leading in Human Development Index, average daily wage rates, lowest infant mortality rate, and highest Gender Parity Index in education. While excelling in social and economic parameters, the state lags slightly in environment-related indicators like plastic waste generation and per capita fossil fuel consumption. This strong performance is highlighted amidst upcoming Legislative Assembly elections where welfare is a key political pitch.
Kerala ranks highest in India for Human Development Index and average daily wage rates in rural areas.
The state has the lowest Infant Mortality Rate and Maternal Mortality Ratio in the country.
Kerala leads in education indicators, including the Gender Parity Index and high Adjusted Net Enrolment Rate.
Exam Points
Data Sources: National Family Health Survey (2021-22), NITI Aayog SDG India Index (2023-24).
The Centre proposes a 50% expansion of Lok Sabha and State Assembly seats to accommodate 33% women's reservation, ensuring incumbent lawmakers' re-election paths are not narrowed. This strategy, increasing Lok Sabha seats from 543 to 816, mirrors the UPA-I government's approach to OBC reservation in higher education, designed by then Education Minister Arjun Singh. The UPA-I expanded seats by 54% to implement a 27% OBC quota without reducing general category seats, creating a "win-win" formula. The current government aims to apply this playbook to legislative bodies, arguing that expansion is overdue.
The Centre plans to expand Lok Sabha and State Assembly seats by 50% to implement 33% women's reservation.
This strategy aims to accommodate reservation without reducing the number of seats for existing lawmakers.
The approach is compared to the UPA-I government's method for implementing OBC reservation in higher education.
Exam Points
Proposed Lok Sabha expansion: From 543 to 816 seats, with 33% (273 seats) reserved for women.
UPA-I OBC reservation: 27% reservation in central higher education institutions.
Architect of OBC quota formula: Arjun Singh (then Education Minister).
Rajya Sabha Chairman C.P. Radhakrishnan and Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla rejected notices from Opposition MPs seeking the removal of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar. The presiding officers concluded that the allegations, including a "tainted" appointment, "deep executive embeddedness," applying different standards to government/opposition, and obstructing electoral fraud investigations, lacked proof or did not meet the "high constitutional bar" for removal proceedings. The order stated that the pendency of a constitutional challenge to his appointment law did not amount to misbehaviour, and the EC's plenary powers under Article 324 were affirmed by the Supreme Court.
Notices for the removal of CEC Gyanesh Kumar, moved by Opposition MPs, were rejected by the presiding officers of Parliament.
The charges, including allegations of a "tainted" appointment and bias, were deemed to lack sufficient proof or meet the constitutional bar for removal.
The order clarified that a pending constitutional challenge to the appointment law does not equate to misbehaviour.
Exam Points
CEC: Gyanesh Kumar.
Presiding Officers: Rajya Sabha Chairman C.P. Radhakrishnan, Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla.
Constitutional Articles for removal: Articles 324(5) and 124(4).
India has announced revised Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) to the Paris Agreement, reflecting a considered step forward in climate action while acknowledging its structural constraints as a developing country. The updated NDCs include enhancing emissions intensity reduction to 47% below 2005 levels by 2035, achieving 60% non-fossil fuel power capacity, and increasing forest cover carbon sinks. The article emphasizes that India's climate policies must balance its developmental needs, including large-scale growth in manufacturing and industry, with the costs and challenges of transitioning to green energy, such as the reliance on coal and the need for massive investment in renewable energy infrastructure.
India updated its Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) to the Paris Agreement.
Key pledges include reducing emissions intensity by 47% by 2035, 60% non-fossil fuel power capacity, and increasing forest cover carbon sinks.
India's climate actions are shaped by its status as a lower middle-income developing country with significant developmental needs.
Exam Points
Agreement: Paris Agreement, with revised Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs).
Emissions Intensity Target: 47% reduction below 2005 levels by 2035.
Non-fossil fuel capacity target: 60% of installed power generation capacity.
Amidst the West Asia crisis, the importance of mediation in conflict resolution is gaining prominence. Historically, mediation has proven effective, with theories like Bercovitch's Contingency Model and Zartman's 'Ripeness' theory explaining its success. International frameworks, including the Hague Conventions and the UN Charter (Article 33), legitimize and support mediation. Notable examples include Kofi Annan in Kenya, the Oslo Accords, and the Camp David Accords. The article discusses China's potential role as a mediator in the Iran conflict, given its economic leverage and consistent anti-war stance, highlighting that successful mediation requires strategic calculation and willingness from conflicting parties.
Mediation remains a crucial tool for conflict resolution, with a long history and established international frameworks.
Theories like 'Mutually Hurting Stalemate' and the Contingency Model explain the conditions and factors for successful mediation.
International legal instruments, including the UN Charter, provide principles and guidance for mediation efforts.
Exam Points
Key Mediation Theories: Bercovitch's Contingency Model and Zartman's 'Ripeness' theory.
International Frameworks: Hague Conventions (1899, 1907) and UN Charter (Chapter VI, Article 33).
UN Resolution: General Assembly Resolution 65/283 (2011) on enhanced mediation capacity.
Read more
Read it. Retain it. Recall it.
Get spaced-repetition flashcards, daily quizzes and offline access — free on Android.