Constitutional Friction Over Governor's Customary Address in Tamil Nadu and Kerala Assemblies
Recent incidents in Tamil Nadu and Kerala have highlighted growing tensions between State Governments and Governors regarding the 'customary address' under Article 176. In Tamil Nadu, Governor R.N. Ravi declined to read the prepared speech, citing 'misleading statements,' leading the DMK to propose a constitutional amendment to abolish the practice. Simultaneously, Kerala's Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar reportedly altered the Cabinet-approved text, omitting criticisms of the Union government. These actions raise significant questions about the Governor's discretionary powers versus their constitutional obligation to act as the mouthpiece of the State Cabinet, potentially undermining federal principles and legislative precedents.
Key Points
- Article 176 mandates the Governor to address the Legislative Assembly at the commencement of the first session each year.
- The address is traditionally prepared by the State Cabinet and represents the government's policy and program for the year.
- Governors in TN and Kerala have recently deviated from or refused to read the approved text, leading to procedural standoffs.
- The TN government passed a resolution to record only the approved version of the speech in House records.
- Critics argue that the Governor cannot voice personal opinions on the floor of the House as they are not elected members.
Exam Facts
- Article 176 of the Indian Constitution mandates the Governor's special address.
- The TN Governor is R.N. Ravi; Kerala's Governor is Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar.
- The DMK is seeking a constitutional amendment to do away with the practice of the Governor's address.
Read it. Retain it. Recall it.
Get spaced-repetition flashcards, daily quizzes and offline access — free on Android.