SC judge questions why Rajasthan HC Acting Chief Justice was not shifted despite "favouritism" allegations
Supreme Court judge Justice Sandeep Mehta wrote three letters to CJI Surya Kant, questioning why Rajasthan High Court Acting Chief Justice (ACJ) Sanjeev Prakash Sharma was not transferred despite "clear evidence" of "favouritism" and "corrupt practices." Justice Mehta described the scenario in Rajasthan HC as "grim and disturbing," alleging a lack of leadership and conduct unbecoming of a leader. The CJI acknowledged the concerns, stating the matter is being examined at the appropriate level and a decision will be made after considering all material, including ACJ Sharma's response.
Key Points
- Supreme Court judge Justice Sandeep Mehta raised concerns about the conduct of Rajasthan High Court Acting Chief Justice (ACJ) Sanjeev Prakash Sharma.
- Allegations include "favouritism," "corrupt practices," and a total lack of leadership qualities by the ACJ.
- The CJI has acknowledged the letters and stated that the matter is under examination through established institutional mechanisms.
- Justice Mehta also highlighted issues of maladminstration, sudden withdrawal of cases, and alleged threats to judges by the ACJ.
Exam Facts
- Justice Sandeep Mehta wrote three letters to CJI Surya Kant.
- The allegations concern Rajasthan High Court Acting Chief Justice (ACJ) Sanjeev Prakash Sharma.
- The ACJ is due to retire on September 26.
Read it. Retain it. Recall it.
Get spaced-repetition flashcards, daily quizzes and offline access — free on Android.