Supreme Court warns civic authorities of contempt for inaction on illegal constructions
The Supreme Court pulled up civic authorities in State capitals for failing to act against illegal constructions and unauthorized use of residential premises for non-residential purposes, despite earlier directions. The court restrained municipal authorities from issuing contradictory orders and warned that any interference would invite contempt proceedings. It directed civic authorities nationwide to identify illegal constructions, clear public spaces of stray cattle, and file compliance affidavits within three weeks. The directions arose from a Tamil Nadu case but were expanded pan-India, with the court noting Bhopal Municipal Corporation's unsealing of premises after a State policy intervention.
Key Points
- The Supreme Court criticized civic authorities for inaction on illegal constructions and unauthorized commercial use of residential areas.
- The court issued a warning against any interference with its orders, threatening contempt proceedings.
- Nationwide directives were issued to identify illegal constructions, clear public spaces, and file compliance reports.
- The case originated from Tamil Nadu but expanded to cover all State capitals.
Exam Facts
- Supreme Court Bench: Justices Ahsanuddin Amanullah and R. Mahadevan.
- State mentioned: Tamil Nadu (origin of case), Bhopal (example of unsealing).
- Additional Solicitor-General: K.M. Nataraj.
Read it. Retain it. Recall it.
Get spaced-repetition flashcards, daily quizzes and offline access — free on Android.