Sabarimala temple board argues 'fertile women' entry antithetical to deity's identity in Supreme Court
The Travancore Devaswom Board (TDB) argued in the Supreme Court that allowing "fertile women" (aged 10-50) into the Sabarimala temple would be antithetical to the deity's identity as a Naishtika Brahmachari (perennial celibate). Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, representing TDB, stated that Lord Ayyappa's unique form at Sabarimala is the sole reason for its reverence, distinguishing it from other Ayyappa temples. The Supreme Court observed that while all religions are equal and individuals have freedom of conscience, religious practices should be left untouched, as per Article 25(2)(a) of the Constitution.
Key Points
- The Travancore Devaswom Board contends that the entry of women aged 10-50 years into Sabarimala temple conflicts with the deity's celibate nature.
- Lord Ayyappa at Sabarimala is revered specifically as a Naishtika Brahmachari, unlike in other Ayyappa temples.
- The Supreme Court emphasized that all religions are equal, and individuals are entitled to freedom of conscience.
- Justice B.V. Nagarathna orally observed that Article 25(2)(a) of the Constitution requires religious practices to be left untouched.
Exam Facts
- The case is being heard by a nine-judge Bench of the Supreme Court.
- Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi represents the Travancore Devaswom Board (TDB).
- The deity at Sabarimala is Lord Ayyappa in the form of a Naishtika Brahmachari.
- Article 25(2)(a) of the Constitution pertains to religious practices.
Read it. Retain it. Recall it.
Get spaced-repetition flashcards, daily quizzes and offline access — free on Android.