The Supreme Court clarified that while the Election Commission (EC) possesses wide discretion under Article 324 and Section 21(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, its powers are not 'untrammelled.' During a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, the EC must adhere to principles of natural justice and prescribed procedures under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960. The Court emphasized that any deviations from standard procedure must respect constitutional guarantees like equality before the law (Article 14) and ensure transparency to protect the civil rights of voters, as revisions can significantly impact voter eligibility.
The EC's power to direct special revisions must be exercised within the framework of existing statutory rules and natural justice.
Section 21(3) of the 1950 Act provides residuary power but does not allow the EC to bypass the procedural 'shackles' of Rule 25.
Any deviation from prescribed norms during electoral roll revisions must be backed by fair, just, and recorded reasons.
Exam Points
Article 324 of the Indian Constitution (Superintendence of elections)
Section 21(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950
Registration of Electors Rules, 1960 (specifically Rule 25)
The Supreme Court has constituted a multi-disciplinary committee of experts, including environmentalists and scientists, to provide a scientific definition of the Aravalli Range. This move follows public concern over a previous definition that considered only elevations of 100 meters or above as 'Aravalli,' which would have left thousands of hills unprotected from unregulated mining. The court has stayed its earlier judgment to prevent irreversible ecological damage. The expert panel will also create a roadmap for permissible activities and regulated mining within this sensitive and ancient mountain ecosystem.
A previous definition based on a 100-meter threshold would have excluded over 11,000 hills in Rajasthan from environmental protection.
The new committee will work under the Supreme Court's supervision to ensure ecological safety and define permissible mining.
Senior advocates argued that mountains are complex tectonic structures that cannot be defined by simple elevation metrics alone.
Exam Points
Total Aravalli hills in Rajasthan estimated at 12,081
Previous threshold was 100-meter elevation for 1,048 hills
The Supreme Court has drawn a clear distinction between 'irrational freebies' used by political parties to lure voters and legitimate 'welfare schemes' aimed at marginalized sections. The Court observed that while state largesse to individuals can be problematic, investing in health and education is a constitutional obligation under the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP). The Bench expressed concern over the lack of dedicated revenue surplus for developmental purposes and rising national debt. It is considering whether such freebies constitute a 'corrupt practice' under the Representation of the People Act.
The Court emphasized that launching welfare schemes is an obligation under the Directive Principles of State Policy.
There is a legal debate on whether freebies should be classified as 'expenditure defrayable by the Union or State' under Article 282.
The Court is shifting away from its 2013 judgment in the S. Subramaniam Balaji case regarding election manifesto promises.
Exam Points
Article 282 of the Constitution (Expenditure defrayable by the Union or a State)
Section 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (Corrupt practices)
S. Subramaniam Balaji versus Tamil Nadu (2013) case
Recent actions by the Governors of Tamil Nadu and Kerala, who deviated from or skipped portions of their customary addresses to the State Assemblies, have sparked a constitutional debate. While Articles 87 and 176 require the President and Governors to make special addresses, constitutional convention dictates they read the text cleared by the Cabinet. Critics argue that treating these addresses as a 'meaningless formality' undermines the Westminster model of parliamentary democracy. Some suggest constitutional amendments to scrap these mandatory addresses while retaining the right to address the legislature under Articles 86 and 175.
Articles 87 and 176 mandate special addresses by the President and Governors at the start of the first session of the year.
Conventionally, the Governor acts as a 'mouthpiece' for the elected government, reading a speech that outlines state policies.
Deviations from the Cabinet-approved text are seen as violations of time-honoured constitutional norms and conventions.
Exam Points
Articles 87 and 176 (Special Address by President and Governor)
Articles 86 and 175 (Right of President and Governor to address House)
The process for removing a Supreme Court or High Court judge, often referred to as 'impeachment,' is governed by Article 124(4) and the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968. A judge can only be removed on grounds of 'proved misbehaviour or incapacity.' However, a significant loophole exists: the Speaker of the Lok Sabha or Chairman of the Rajya Sabha has the statutory power to admit or refuse a removal motion even if signed by the required number of MPs. This discretion can potentially thwart the constitutional process, especially if the government of the day opposes the motion.
The Constitution uses the term 'removal' for judges; 'impeachment' is technically reserved for the President under Article 61.
A removal motion requires signatures from 100 Lok Sabha members or 50 Rajya Sabha members to be initiated.
The Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968, outlines the procedure for investigation by a high-level committee after a motion is admitted.
Exam Points
Article 124(4) and 124(5) of the Constitution
Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968
Requirement of 100 Lok Sabha or 50 Rajya Sabha members for a motion
A new Private Member's Bill proposes lowering the age threshold for treating children as adults in cases of 'heinous' crimes from 16 to 14 years. This follows the 2015 amendment to the Juvenile Justice (JJ) Act, which introduced a 'transfer system' for 16-18 year olds. Critics argue this move is a 'step back,' as it ignores developmental science and structural vulnerabilities. Data from the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) suggests that adolescents aged 14-16 are not the primary drivers of serious crime, contradicting the bill's premise and raising concerns about punitive rather than rehabilitative justice.
The 2015 JJ Act allows 16-18 year olds to be tried as adults for heinous crimes after a preliminary assessment by the JJ Board.
Lowering the age to 14 would expose younger children to adult prisons and criminal processes, potentially causing long-term harm.
NCRB data shows that Children in Conflict with the Law (CiCL) constitute only 0.5% of total registered crimes in 2023.
Exam Points
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015
NCRB 2023 statistics: 31,365 cases registered against CiCL
Proposed age threshold reduction from 16 to 14 years
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has recommended connecting the Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) of BRICS nations to the 2026 summit agenda. This initiative aims to streamline cross-border payments, which are currently plagued by high costs and transparency issues. CBDCs offer a sovereign-guaranteed, blockchain-based alternative to private cryptocurrencies. While this could bypass the SWIFT network and facilitate trade with sanctioned nations like Russia and Iran, it may also invite geopolitical friction, particularly with the U.S. regarding the global dominance of the dollar and potential retaliatory tariffs.
CBDCs provide a transparent and immutable record of transactions, helping to curb money laundering and black money.
India's UPI infrastructure is highly successful domestically, making CBDCs more relevant for international rather than domestic use.
Linking CBDCs could allow for direct payments that do not rely on the dollar-denominated SWIFT system.
Exam Points
2026 BRICS summit to be held in India
SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication) network
RBI's stance: Conservative on private crypto, progressive on CBDCs
India's recent white paper, 'Democratising Access to AI Infrastructure,' argues that AI's future will be determined by who controls the underlying infrastructure—compute power, datasets, and model ecosystems. Currently, these resources are concentrated among a few global corporations. To ensure competitiveness and sovereignty, India must develop its own physical (data centres, GPUs) and digital (datasets, protocols) infrastructure. The paper emphasizes a 'Digital Public Infrastructure' (DPI) approach, using public-private partnerships (PPPs) to provide shared, standards-based access to AI resources for startups and public institutions.
AI infrastructure is becoming a foundational economic asset, similar to roads or electricity, enabling modern innovation.
India hosts nearly 20% of global data but only 3% of global data centre capacity, creating a significant strategic asymmetry.
A sovereign AI infrastructure is necessary to prevent dependence on external entities and to protect domestic innovation.
Exam Points
IndiaAI Mission and AIRAWAT platform
India hosts 20% of global data but only 3% of data centre capacity
Renewed U.S. interest in Greenland has strained relations with the European Union and NATO allies. The U.S. administration's pressure, including threats of 10% to 25% tariffs on European countries that oppose the Greenland quest, has led the EU to consider a 'trade bazooka' (Anti-Coercion Instrument) of €93 billion. Greenland, while part of the Kingdom of Denmark, holds strategic importance for Arctic security and military bases. The situation highlights a growing rift in the transatlantic alliance and a shift toward transactional diplomacy that could undermine long-standing security arrangements.
Greenland is a self-governing territory within the Kingdom of Denmark and is vital for NATO's northern flank.
The EU is the U.S.'s largest trade partner, and escalating tariffs could severely damage global economic stability.
Most Greenlanders prefer to remain part of the Danish Kingdom, according to local polls (85% support).
Exam Points
€93 billion ($107.7 billion) EU 'trade bazooka' or Anti-Coercion Instrument (ACI)
1946 U.S. offer of $100 million in gold for Greenland
NATO obligation to protect Greenland as part of Denmark
A Supreme Court Bench recently delivered a split verdict on the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA), 1988. Section 17A requires prior approval from the government before initiating an investigation into a public servant for acts related to their official duties. Proponents argue it protects honest officers from malicious prosecution, while critics claim it creates an unnecessary shield for the corrupt and violates Article 14 (equality before the law). The matter has been referred to a larger Bench for a final decision on whether such protections are constitutional.
Section 17A was inserted into the PCA in 2018 to ensure officers can make bold decisions without fear of wrongful prosecution.
The Santhanam Committee (1962) was instrumental in the original formulation of anti-corruption laws in India.
The Vineet Narain case (1998) previously struck down similar 'Single Directive' requirements for high-ranking officers.
Exam Points
Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (inserted in 2018)
Santhanam Committee (1962) on prevention of corruption
Vineet Narain versus Union of India (1998) Supreme Court case
Read more
Read it. Retain it. Recall it.
Get spaced-repetition flashcards, daily quizzes and offline access — free on Android.