The Supreme Court is examining whether Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) can strike individuals off electoral rolls based on citizenship inquiries before a final decision by the Central government. The bench, including Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi, questioned if an ERO's finding could trigger investigations into an individual's right to remain in India. The Election Commission argues that Article 326, the Representation of the People Act, and the Registration of Electors Rules 1960 empower them to conduct such inquiries to ensure only citizens are on the rolls. The court is concerned about the potential for these findings to lead to deportation without due process.
EROs are conducting inquisitorial enquiries into citizenship during Special Intensive Revisions (SIR).
The Supreme Court is concerned that removing a voter's name based on citizenship doubts might strip them of rights before a final government decision.
The Election Commission maintains that citizenship is a cornerstone of the electoral process and non-citizens are not entitled to vote.
Exam Points
Article 326 (Right of adult Indian citizens to vote)
The Kerala Assembly passed the Malayalam Language Bill 2025, aiming to adopt Malayalam as the official language for all sectors, including the judiciary and IT. While intended to promote the state language, it has faced opposition from leaders in Karnataka concerned about the impact on Tamil and Kannada linguistic minorities in Kerala. The Bill includes provisions for education in other languages for minorities and exemptions for students from other states. The editorial emphasizes that language policies must balance state language promotion with the constitutional rights of linguistic minorities to avoid inter-state hostilities and ensure national integration.
The Bill proposes Malayalam as the first language for schoolchildren and the official language for all state sectors.
Linguistic minorities in notified areas can still correspond with the government in Tamil or Kannada.
The editorial suggests that the Inter-State Council should be used to resolve linguistic disputes between states.
As AI integration grows, its environmental costs, including high electricity consumption and carbon emissions, are coming under scrutiny. Reports suggest the ICT industry accounts for 1.8%-2.8% of global greenhouse gas emissions. A single AI prompt can consume significantly more energy than a standard search. The article calls for India to include AI impact assessments within its Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) framework. It suggests adopting sustainable practices like using renewable energy for data centers and following international guidelines like UNESCO’s Recommendation on the Ethics of AI to mitigate the negative environmental impacts of large-scale algorithms.
Training a single Large Language Model (LLM) can generate approximately 300,000 kilograms of carbon emissions.
AI servers may utilize up to 6.6 billion cubic meters of water for cooling by 2027, leading to water scarcity concerns.
India needs to measure the environmental costs of developing large AI algorithms through mandatory disclosure standards.
Exam Points
UNESCO’s Recommendation on the Ethics of AI (2021)
The color blue holds deep historical significance in India, tracing back to the 1859 Indigo movement and Gandhi’s 1917 Champaran Satyagraha against the oppressive 'tinkathia' system. Later, B.R. Ambedkar adopted the blue suit, transforming the color into a symbol of Dalit identity, resistance, and the expanse of the sky, representing non-discrimination. Today, the blue Ashoka Chakra in the national flag symbolizes the spirit of civil disobedience and the right to assemble. The article explores how blue evolved from a mark of marginalization and colonial exploitation to a powerful emblem of social equality and constitutional rights.
The 'tinkathia' system forced peasants to plant indigo on 3/20th of their land, leading to the Champaran Satyagraha.
Ambedkar’s choice of a blue suit represented the non-discriminatory nature of the sky and social equality.
Blue is historically associated with the struggles of the marginalized and the working class in India.
A two-judge bench of the Supreme Court delivered a split verdict on the constitutionality of Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. This provision requires prior government approval before investigating public servants for official decisions. Justice B.V. Nagarathna declared the provision unconstitutional, viewing it as a barrier to transparency. Conversely, Justice K.V. Viswanathan argued it is necessary to protect honest officers from frivolous complaints and 'policy paralysis.' He suggested that an independent authority like the Lokpal should handle the grant of sanction. The case has been referred to a larger three-judge bench for final determination.
Section 17A was introduced to prevent the harassment of public servants for bona fide official decisions.
Justice Nagarathna argued that the provision violates the principle of equality before the law.
Justice Viswanathan emphasized that the Lokpal has the authority to inquire into allegations even against the Prime Minister.
Exam Points
Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Lokpal and Lok Ayuktas Act
Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Justice K.V. Viswanathan
The Supreme Court highlighted that the Right to Education (RTE) Act is a vital tool for transforming India's social structure by ensuring children from diverse backgrounds study together. Justice P.S. Narasimha stated that the obligation of neighborhood schools to admit children from weaker and disadvantaged sections is 'normatively ambitious.' The court emphasized that equality must start in the classroom, where children of multi-millionaires and street vendors sit side-by-side. The judgment reinforces the constitutional mandate of Article 21A to provide free and compulsory education, describing its implementation as a national mission for both government and local authorities.
The RTE Act envisages elementary education in a shared institutional space to break class and caste barriers.
Neighborhood schools have a statutory mandate to ensure inclusive admissions for disadvantaged sections.
The court views the implementation of Article 21A as a 'national mission' for the government.
To address the growing menace of 'digital arrests,' where scammers impersonate law enforcement to extort money, the Union government has formed a high-level Inter-Departmental Committee (IDC). Chaired by the Special Secretary (Internal Security) of the Ministry of Home Affairs, the committee includes representatives from the RBI, DoT, MeitY, and major tech platforms like Google and WhatsApp. The IDC aims to identify legislative gaps, suggest corrective measures, and guide enforcement agencies in real-time. This move follows Supreme Court directions to clear the 'bane' affecting a large population, particularly the elderly and vulnerable who have lost crores to these scams.
Digital arrest scams involve fraudulent calls claiming the victim is under investigation for illegal activities to extort money.
The Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C) plays a central role in the new committee.
The IDC will coordinate between multiple ministries and financial institutions to block fraudulent transactions.
Exam Points
Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C)
Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA)
Inter-Departmental Committee (IDC) formed on December 26
Reports indicate the Indian government is considering a requirement for smartphone manufacturers to disclose their source code to third-party testing agencies for security reviews. While the government aims to mitigate cyber threats and backdoors, tech companies like Apple and Google are resistant, citing trade secrets and the risk of exposing vulnerabilities to malicious actors. The proposal falls under the Mandatory Testing and Certification of Telecommunication Equipment (MTCTE) framework. Critics argue that such intrusive measures could compromise user privacy and discourage global tech investment in India, while the government maintains it is keeping an 'open mind' on the issue.
Source code is the core repository of software; its exposure is considered a major security risk by companies.
The Department of Telecommunications (DoT) and MeitY are discussing the feasibility of these regulations.
The Indian Cellular and Electronics Association (ICEA) has expressed concerns over the impact on the industry.
Exam Points
MTCTE framework
Indian Telecom Security Assurance Requirement (ITSAR)
National Centre for Communication Security (NCCS)
Read more
Read it. Retain it. Recall it.
Get spaced-repetition flashcards, daily quizzes and offline access — free on Android.