Supreme Court Directs Tamil Nadu to Await Presidential Reference Verdict on Governor's Authority to Reserve Bills
The Supreme Court has asked the Tamil Nadu government to wait for the outcome of a Presidential Reference regarding the scope of a Governor's authority to reserve state bills for the President's consideration. The case involves Governor R.N. Ravi's decision to reserve two bills—the Kalaignar University Bill and the TN Physical Education and Sports University (Amendment) Bill—after withholding assent. A five-judge Constitution Bench is examining whether Governors have the discretion to reserve bills that have been re-passed by the State Legislature, or if they are bound by the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers.
Key Points
- The Supreme Court is examining the Governor's constitutional remit under Article 200 and Article 201.
- A previous judgment set a three-month deadline for Governors and the President to act on bills sent for assent.
- The court had earlier granted 'deemed assent' to bills delayed by the Governor under Article 142.
- The Presidential Reference is being heard under Article 143 of the Constitution.
Exam Facts
- Article 143 (Presidential Reference)
- Article 142 (Supreme Court's power for complete justice)
- Constitution Bench of 5 judges
Read it. Retain it. Recall it.
Get spaced-repetition flashcards, daily quizzes and offline access — free on Android.