"One Nation, One Election" proposal raises concerns about federalism and democratic principles
The article critically examines the "One Nation, One Election" (ONOE) proposal, arguing it could undermine federalism and democratic principles. It highlights that simultaneous elections, while potentially reducing expenditure and promoting stability, may lead to reduced accountability, limit regional parties' influence, and increase central interference. The article discusses various constitutional amendments required, such as for Articles 83, 172, 356, and 324, and the need for a consensus among states. It also points out that the proposal could lead to frequent no-confidence motions and President's Rule, potentially destabilizing state governments.
Key Points
- The "One Nation, One Election" (ONOE) proposal aims for simultaneous elections but faces criticism for potentially undermining federalism.
- Implementing ONOE would require significant constitutional amendments, including to Articles 83, 172, 356, and 324.
- Concerns include reduced accountability of elected representatives, increased central interference, and potential destabilization of state governments through frequent no-confidence motions.
- The proposal could disadvantage regional parties and lead to a "one-size-fits-all" approach, ignoring diverse state-specific issues.
Exam Facts
- The Election Commission of India (ECI) has stated that simultaneous elections are feasible with constitutional amendments.
- Articles 83 and 172 relate to the duration of Houses of Parliament and State Legislatures.
- Article 356 deals with President's Rule in states.
- Article 324 grants powers to the Election Commission.
- The Law Commission of India, in its 2025 report, supported simultaneous elections.
Read it. Retain it. Recall it.
Get spaced-repetition flashcards, daily quizzes and offline access — free on Android.