Supreme Court emphasizes independence of the Bar for rule of law preservation
The Supreme Court asserted that the independence of lawyers is as crucial as judicial independence for preserving the rule of law and democracy. A Bench led by Justice P.S. Narasimha stated that self-regulation is a defining feature of the legal profession, insulating advocates from external pressures. While acknowledging mounting pendency as a major challenge, the court questioned why the Bar is seldom held responsible for reducing delays. It called for a "paradigm shift" towards collaborative efforts between the Bench and Bar to tackle pendency and proposed establishing a full-time "National Legal Academy" for continuous legal education for advocates.
Key Points
- The Supreme Court highlighted the critical importance of the Bar's independence for upholding the rule of law and democracy.
- Self-regulation is identified as a key feature of the legal profession, protecting advocates from external influences.
- The court called for a collaborative approach between the Bench and Bar to address mounting case pendency.
- A "National Legal Academy" was proposed to provide continuous legal education for advocates.
Exam Facts
- Supreme Court Bench led by Justice P.S. Narasimha.
- The court emphasized the "independence of the Bar."
- Proposed establishment of a full-time "National Legal Academy."
- Directed the Bar Council of India to undertake a "comprehensive performance audit" of disciplinary mechanisms.
Read it. Retain it. Recall it.
Get spaced-repetition flashcards, daily quizzes and offline access — free on Android.