Furore over the Mekedatu project: Inter-state river dispute
The article details the ongoing dispute between Tamil Nadu and Karnataka over the Mekedatu dam project on the Cauvery river. Tamil Nadu opposes the project, arguing it violates Supreme Court orders and reduces water flow to its delta region, impacting farmers. Karnataka maintains the project is for drinking water and power generation, not irrigation, and seeks approval from central authorities. The dispute highlights the complexities of inter-state river water sharing, involving legal battles, political negotiations, and the livelihoods of millions. The Supreme Court and various tribunals have previously adjudicated on Cauvery water sharing, making any new project highly contentious without mutual agreement.
Key Points
- The Mekedatu dam project on the Cauvery river is a point of contention between Tamil Nadu and Karnataka.
- Tamil Nadu opposes the project, citing potential reduction in water flow and violation of Supreme Court orders.
- Karnataka asserts the project is for drinking water and power generation, not irrigation, and seeks central approval.
- The dispute underscores the complexities of inter-state river water sharing and its impact on agriculture.
- Previous Supreme Court rulings and tribunals have set precedents for Cauvery water allocation, making new projects sensitive.
Exam Facts
- Mekedatu project is on the Cauvery river.
- The dispute is between Tamil Nadu and Karnataka.
- The Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal (CWDT) has given awards on water sharing.
Read it. Retain it. Recall it.
Get spaced-repetition flashcards, daily quizzes and offline access — free on Android.