Supreme Court prioritizes pedestrians; cities must follow suit
This article discusses the Supreme Court's emphasis on pedestrian rights and the need for Indian cities to prioritize safe and accessible footpaths. It highlights that walking is the primary mode of transport for a significant portion of the population, especially the poor, yet cities often neglect pedestrian infrastructure. The article points out that inadequate footpaths, encroachments, and unsafe crossings contribute to high pedestrian fatalities. It argues that cities must move beyond car-centric planning and integrate pedestrian needs into urban design, ensuring continuous, obstruction-free footpaths and safe public spaces. The article calls for a paradigm shift in urban planning to make cities truly inclusive and safe for pedestrians.
Key Points
- The Supreme Court has prioritized pedestrian rights, urging cities to provide safe and accessible footpaths.
- Walking is the primary mode of transport for many, especially the poor, yet pedestrian infrastructure is often neglected.
- Inadequate footpaths, encroachments, and unsafe crossings contribute to high pedestrian fatalities.
- Cities need to shift from car-centric planning to integrating pedestrian needs into urban design.
- A paradigm shift in urban planning is required to create inclusive and safe cities for pedestrians.
Exam Facts
- The article references a Supreme Court order on pedestrian rights.
- It mentions the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the need for its review.
- The National Urban Transport Policy (2006) advocates for prioritizing non-motorized transport.
Read it. Retain it. Recall it.
Get spaced-repetition flashcards, daily quizzes and offline access — free on Android.