Supreme Court allows euthanasia for incurably ill, rabid, or dangerous stray dogs
The Supreme Court refused to modify its 2025 order directing states and Union Territories to remove stray dogs from high-footfall public institutions. It clarified that such dogs cannot be "re-released" even after vaccination and sterilization. A Bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and N.V. Anjaria also permitted legally permissible measures, including euthanasia, for "rabid, incurably ill or demonstrably dangerous or aggressive dogs." The court emphasized the need for a balance between human safety and animal welfare, directing states to establish at least one Animal Birth Control (ABC) centre in every district and ensure proper infrastructure and trained personnel.
Key Points
- The Supreme Court upheld its 2025 order for the removal of stray dogs from public institutions, clarifying they cannot be re-released post-vaccination/sterilization.
- Euthanasia is now permitted for stray dogs that are rabid, incurably ill, or demonstrably dangerous/aggressive.
- The court stressed the importance of balancing the right to live with dignity for humans and the welfare of animals.
- States and UTs are mandated to establish at least one Animal Birth Control (ABC) centre per district with adequate facilities and trained staff.
- The Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules, 2023, were referenced, which did not support the contention that stray dogs possess an "indefeasible or absolute right" to occupy public spaces.
Exam Facts
- The Supreme Court Bench included Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and N.V. Anjaria.
- The court refused to modify its 2025 order regarding stray dogs.
- The Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules, 2023, are relevant to this issue.
- The ruling allows euthanasia for "rabid, incurably ill or demonstrably dangerous or aggressive dogs."
Read it. Retain it. Recall it.
Get spaced-repetition flashcards, daily quizzes and offline access — free on Android.