The Future of Governance in Post-Maoist India: Addressing Tribal Alienation and the Fifth Schedule
Despite the decline of Maoist insurgency, effective governance in Fifth Schedule areas remains a challenge. The root causes of the movement—underdevelopment, structural exclusion, and lack of representation—persist. While the Constitution provides for Tribal Advisory Councils and PESA (Panchayat Extension to Scheduled Areas Act), their implementation has been weak. Alienation of tribal lands and lack of local representation in administrative units have fueled grievances. Future governance must focus on mandatory quotas at local levels, restoring trust in public institutions, and ensuring that self-governing bodies have real power over local resources.
Key Points
- Maoist insurgency is rooted in underdevelopment, structural exclusion, and lack of tribal representation.
- The Fifth Schedule and PESA are key constitutional tools for tribal governance but face implementation gaps.
- PESA violations regarding land acquisition have been a major source of tribal grievance.
- Effective governance requires addressing the 'representation deficit' of locals in administrative units.
Exam Facts
- PESA Act: 1996.
- Fifth Schedule areas: Located in Central and Eastern India.
- Expert Committee Report (2008) linked natural resource neglect to poor governance.
Read it. Retain it. Recall it.
Get spaced-repetition flashcards, daily quizzes and offline access — free on Android.