Centre rejects lowering age of consent, warns of increased trafficking and child abuse risks
The Union government has strongly opposed any move by the Supreme Court to reduce the age of consent from 18 to 16 under child protection laws. The Centre warned that such a reduction would open "floodgates to trafficking and other forms of child abuse" by diluting the statutory presumption of vulnerability crucial for child protection. It highlighted that a 2007 study by the Ministry of Women and Child Development found that over 53% of children reported sexual abuse, often by individuals in positions of trust. The government's stance contrasts with arguments from some legal experts who suggest consensual sexual activity between 16 and 18 should not be criminalized under the POCSO Act.
Key Points
- The Union government firmly opposes reducing the age of consent from 18 to 16, citing risks of increased trafficking and child abuse.
- It argues that lowering the age would undermine the fundamental principle of child vulnerability enshrined in protection laws.
- A government study revealed a high prevalence of child sexual abuse, often perpetrated by trusted individuals, reinforcing the need for current protections.
- The Centre's position contrasts with some legal arguments advocating for decriminalizing consensual sexual activity for adolescents aged 16-18.
- The government emphasizes safeguarding children's rights and ensuring robust legal frameworks against exploitation.
Exam Facts
- Current age of consent: 18 years.
- Proposed reduction: To 16 years.
- Law mentioned: Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.
- Government study: 2007 Ministry of Women and Child Development study (53.22% children reported sexual abuse).
Read it. Retain it. Recall it.
Get spaced-repetition flashcards, daily quizzes and offline access — free on Android.