Advocating for biological models to replace live animal testing
The article argues for a paradigm shift from live animal testing to artificial biological models, citing ethical concerns and the unreliability of animal test results for human harm prediction. It highlights the suffering animals endure and proposes that advancements in tissue engineering allow for the cultivation of various artificial anatomical parts, making animal-free experimentation feasible. The author suggests amending 'The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960' to mandate the consideration of lab-grown models. The piece also calls for a change in societal values and increased awareness of animal suffering, advocating for the use of visual and ex-corpus models in education and research for safety testing.
Key Points
- Animal testing is ethically problematic and often unreliable for predicting harm to humans.
- Advances in tissue engineering enable the creation of artificial anatomical parts for experimentation.
- The author proposes amending the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, to prioritize lab-grown models.
- A shift in values and increased awareness about animal suffering are crucial for adopting alternative methods.
- Visual and ex-corpus models can replace animal dissection in educational and research settings.
Exam Facts
- The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.
- Mentions A.L. Tatum, a toxicology researcher.
- Discusses the shift from human studies to animal studies in toxicity tests (early 20th century).
Read it. Retain it. Recall it.
Get spaced-repetition flashcards, daily quizzes and offline access — free on Android.